Moral judgments are known to influence seemingly descriptive assessments. Varga and colleagues show that individuals perceived as morally bad are more likely to be judged as unhealthy and diseased, a phenomenon termed “the pathologization effect”. Across three vignette-based experiments, we identify a complementary pattern: the “reverse pathologization effect”: participants were more likely to attribute bad actions and character to individuals described as having a disorder than to those described as healthy, and more likely to attribute good actions and character to individuals described as making a miraculous recovery than to those who remained ill.